Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39473910›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2024

Association Between Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) Colonization Status at Time of Hospital Admission and the Subsequent Development of CRE Infection and Mortality in High-Risk Patients.

Basem M Alraddadi, Emily L G Heaphy, Muhannad S Alzahrani, Mouad Alqadi, Moayad Sami Qashqari, Mohammed S Alhuthali, Mohammad Kamal Al Hroub, Lama Hefni, Abeer N Alshukairi, Yasser Aldabbagh and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Basem M AlraddadiMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Emily L G HeaphyResearch- Jeddah Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0000-3692-1168
Muhannad S AlzahraniMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mouad AlqadiMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Moayad Sami QashqariMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed S AlhuthaliMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad Kamal Al HroubInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Lama HefniMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer N AlshukairiMedicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Yasser AldabbaghDepartment of Medicine, Al-Moosa Health Group, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed QutubPathology and Laboratory Medicine Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to determine the impact of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) colonization status on development of CRE infection and 30-day mortality outcomes in high-risk patients. Patients and Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from October 2022 to July 2023. It included all patients aged 14 years and older admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), the renal transplant unit and the oncology units who were screened for CRE colonization upon hospital admission. Results: Overall, 246 patients comprised the study population and 37 patients (56.8% ICU, 13.5% renal transplant unit, and 29.7% oncology units) had a positive CRE screening test. The majority of the isolates (59.5%) were OXA-48. Almost one-third (32.1%) of the patients had diabetes mellitus and 55.3% had any underlying immunosuppression. Eight (3.3%) patients had a confirmed CRE infection and 35 (14.2%) patients died within 30 days of screening. A positive CRE screening test significantly increased the likelihood of 30-day mortality for this high-risk patient population (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.10-8.51, p = 0.03). Conclusion: A substantial percentage of the high-risk patients had a positive CRE screening test at the time of hospital admission and CRE-colonization status predicted 30-day mortality. Further studies are needed to determine the best practices for CRE screening as a strategy to prevent infection and mortality.

Indexed as

carbapenem-resistant enterobacteralesCREepidemiologyOXA-48Saudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID39473910
PMCPMC11520729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.