ArticleWorld journal of clinical oncology2024
Inflammatory and nutritional markers in colorectal cancer: Implications for prognosis and treatment.
Article in World journal of clinical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Simple Ratios: Can the Preoperative HALP Score Provide a More Effective Inflammatory Biomarker for Colon Cancer Survival?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in lung adenocarcinoma based on tumor size and carcinoembryonic antigen.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Albumin-to-CEA Ratio in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Taxonomic Profiling of Systemic Inflammatory Parameters as Predictors of Tumor Progression in Primary Colorectal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of nutritional and inflammatory markers in colorectal cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastasis remains poor despite advancements in detection and treatment. Preoperative inflammatory and nutritional markers have emerged as significant predictors of prognosis in CRC, potentially guiding treatment decisions and improving patient outcomes. This editorial explores the prognostic value of markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, hemoglobin, and serum albumin levels. By integrating these markers into prognostic models, clinicians can better stratify patients, personalize treatment strategies, and ultimately enhance clinical outcomes. This review highlights the importance of these markers in providing a comprehensive assessment of patient condition and underscores the need for further research to validate their clinical utility and uncover underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.