Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39473834›Full record

ArticlePaediatric & neonatal pain2024

Supporting parent capacity to manage pain in young children with cancer at home: Co-design and usability testing of the PainCaRe app.

Lindsay A Jibb, William Liu, Jennifer N Stinson, Paul C Nathan, Julie Chartrand, Nicole M Alberts, Elham Hashemi, Tatenda Masama, Hannah G Pease, Lessley B Torres and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatric & neonatal pain, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pain Assessment Tools for Infants, Children, and Adolescents With Cancer: A Scoping Review.Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lindsay A JibbUniversity of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
William LiuFaculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Jennifer N StinsonUniversity of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Paul C NathanUniversity of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Julie ChartrandFaculty of Health Sciences University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Nicole M AlbertsConcordia University Montreal Quebec Canada.
Elham HashemiHospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada.
Tatenda MasamaHospital for Sick Children Toronto Ontario Canada.
Hannah G PeaseUniversity of California Irvine Irvine California USA.
Lessley B TorresUniversity of California Irvine Irvine California USA.
Haydee G CortesUniversity of California Irvine Irvine California USA.
Susan KuczynskiOntario Parents Advocating for Children with Cancer Toronto Ontario Canada.
Sam LiuUniversity of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada.
Henry LaPathverse Inc. Victoria British Columbia Canada.
Michelle A FortierUniversity of California Irvine Irvine California USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young children receiving outpatient cancer care are vulnerable to undermanaged pain. App-based solutions that provide pain treatment advice to parents in real-time and in all environments may improve access to quality pain care. We used a parent co-design approach involving iterative rounds of user testing and software modification to develop a usable Pain Caregiver Resource (PainCaRe) real-time pediatric cancer pain management app. Parents of children (2-11 years) with cancer completed three standardized modules using a PainCaRe prototype. App usability and acceptability were evaluated using the validated System Usability Scale and a thematic analysis of app testing sessions and interviews. Iterative testing sessions were conducted until data saturation. Interview themes were synthesized into action items that guided revisions to PainCaRe and additional testing rounds were conducted as necessary. Twenty-two parents participated in three testing cycles. Overall, parents described PainCaRe as an acceptable and potentially clinically useful pain management tool. Mean system usability scores were in the acceptable scale range during each testing cycle. Usability issues identified and resolved included those related to software malfunction, complicated app navigation logic, lack of clarity on pain assessment questions, and the need for pain management advice specifically tailored to child developmental stage. Using co-design methods, the PainCaRe cancer pain management app was successfully refined for its acceptability and utility to parents. Next steps will include a PainCaRe pilot study before evaluating the impact of the app on younger children's pain outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.

Indexed as

cancerco‐designmHealthpainparentspediatrics

Identifiers

PMID39473834
PMCPMC11514300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.