ReviewTurkish journal of medical sciences2024
Management of acute pain in adults with sickle cell disease: the experience of the Clinical Hematology Department of the University of Dakar.
Review in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The evolution of sickle cell disease (SCD) is marked by the occurrence of painful episodes linked to the obstruction of microvessels by sickle cells, known as vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC). The aim of this work was to report the practical aspects of the management of acute pain in adults with SCD. Recommendations based on these practices are also provided. Materials and methods: This prospective, cross-sectional, descriptive, and analytical study was conducted over a four-month period of all sickle cell patients admitted to emergency departments for VOC. The parameters studied were sociodemographic, clinicobiological, therapeutic, and evolutionary. Results: There were 118 cases of VOC identified, representing a prevalence of 78.14% of sickle cell emergencies. The mean age of the patients was 28.41 years. The SS sickle cell phenotype accounted for 86.61% of the cases. Osteoarticular pain was the reason for admission for 88.39% of the patients; it was located in the lower limbs in 39.08% and in the spine in 27.1%. Pain intensity was moderate in 6.25% of the patients, intense in 31.25%, and unbearable in 55.55%. Multimodal analgesia was the most commonly used treatment method, combining those of levels one and two (74.31%) and levels one and three (8.25%). The mean dose of morphine administered was 17.14 mg when morphine alone was prescribed for titration, 13.57 mg when paracetamol and morphine were combined, and 15.83 mg when nefopam and morphine were combined. Clinical outcome was favorable in 68.87% of the cases. Conclusion: Wide variability was observed in the modalities of analgesic treatment of sickle cell VOC. These variations reflect different views on the appropriateness of opioids. This study highlights the efficacy of multimodal analgesia in the management of acute pain in patients with SCD, particularly in regard to morphine sparing. Context-specific recommendations will be needed to harmonize practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.