ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2024
Thoracic trauma in the geriatric population and possible preventive measures: a retrospective analysis of 261 cases.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thoracic injuries in elderly trauma patients epidemiology, injury characteristics, in-hospital care and outcome.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: The increase in the proportion of the elderly population within society is concurrently escalating their vulnerability to traumas, notably falls associated with age-related comorbidities. Materials and methods: This retrospective analysis involved the examination of data pertaining to patients aged 65 and above who were admitted to our clinic for inpatient treatment following thoracic trauma. Various parameters were statistically compared between the groups with indoor and outdoor traumas. Results: Of the 261 patients included in the study, 59.4% were male, and the average age in the entire sample was 75.52 ± 7.79. Moreover, 136 (52%) patients had indoor trauma, while 125 (48%) had outdoor trauma. The mean value for all the patients on the Itaki Fall Risk Scale (FRS) II score was 11.04 ± 4.18. The Itaki FRS II score was significantly higher for indoor accidents (11.90 ± 4.34) compared to outdoor accidents (10.10 ± 3.78) (p < 0.001). Additionally, the absence of a fall history and low risk according to the Itaki FRS II score were higher for outdoor accidents compared to indoor accidents, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In geriatric trauma occurring outdoors, bilateral rib fractures and extrathoracic findings were significantly more prevalent (p = 0.011 and p = 0.010, respectively). The majority of patients were followed-up without any surgical intervention (73.9%), the most common surgical interventions were catheter (10.3%) and tube thoracostomy (10.3%), and 1.5% of the patients required surgical exploration. Trauma resulted in mortality in 1.5% of the patients. Conclusion: In the future, specialized measures and prospective studies tailored to the geriatric population, which will constitute the largest demographic segment of society, can facilitate the prevention of trauma-related morbidity and mortality, including associated financial costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.