ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2024
Trends and Changes in Endoscopic Management and Clinical Outcomes of Colonic Diverticular Bleeding during the Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pandemic.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study evaluated the endoscopic management and clinical outcomes of patients with colonic diverticular bleeding (CDB) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods: A total of 388 hospitalized patients diagnosed with CDB at two hospitals during (April 2020-March 2023) and before (April 2017-March 2020) the pandemic were enrolled in the study. We performed one-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) on the participants. We analyzed endoscopic management and clinical outcomes before and during the pandemic using a total of 264 patients matched in a PSM analysis. Results: A total of 213 (1.3%) and 172 (1.2%) colonoscopies were performed before and during the pandemic, respectively in patients with CDB (P = 0.70). After PSM, the number of early colonoscopies (63.6% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.03) and colonoscopies performed outside regular working hours (23.8% vs. 47.7%, P < 0.01) was significantly lower during the pandemic than before it. A univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the risks of rebleeding within 30 days (odds ratio [OR]: 0.81, P = 0.42) and composite outcome (OR: 0.90, P = 0.69) were not increased during the pandemic. Conclusions: During the pandemic, the number of early colonoscopies and colonoscopies performed outside regular working hours decreased; however, this decrease did not influence rebleeding and composite outcome in patients with CDB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.