ArticleJournal of the anus, rectum and colon2024
Surgical Outcomes after Laparoscopic Repairs of Para-colostomy Hernia and Para-ileal-conduit Hernia: A Comparative Study.
Article in Journal of the anus, rectum and colon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Parastomal hernia after robot-assisted cystectomy and ileum conduit: incidence, risk or protective factors and outcomes of minimal-invasive hernia repair-systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Management and outcomes profiles of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of the study was to investigate the differences in clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes between para-colostomy hernia (PCH) and para-ileal-conduit hernia (PICH) after laparoscopic repairs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 41 laparoscopic parastomal hernia repairs performed at the Jikei University Daisan Hospital between June 2012 and September 2023. The data were divided into PCH (n=31) and PICH (n=10) groups and compared. Results: The comparison of patient backgrounds and hernia characteristics showed no significant differences between PCH and PICH groups. Surgical procedures included laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair (LSB) for PCH (29 cases) and PICH (8 cases), and endoscopic Pauli repair (ePauli) for both PCH (2 cases) and PICH (2 cases). Intraoperative findings indicated a significantly higher rate of severe intra-abdominal adhesions (Zühlke index III/IV) in the PICH group (60%) compared to the PCH group (23%) (p=0.0485). The median operation time was significantly longer for PICH (223 [120-423] minutes) than for PCH (158 [48-386] minutes) (p=0.0467). Perioperative complications occurred in 1 PCH case (3%) and 2 PICH cases (20%), with no significant difference in postoperative hospital stay (9 [4-19] vs. 9 [6-14] days). With the follow-up period of 57 [2-110] months for PCH and 52 [20-104] months for PICH, recurrence was observed in 4 PCH cases (12%) but not statistically significant. Conclusions: The comparison of PCH and PICH suggests that PICH is associated with more severe intra-abdominal adhesions and longer operation times, indicating higher operative difficulty. Therefore, it would be advisable to discuss the surgical outcomes of repair for these stomas separately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.