ArticleCureus2024
Dermatological Ultrasound of Less Frequent Dermatological Vascular Anomalies: A Retrospective Study and Literature Review From a Reference Center in Bogotá, Colombia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular anomalies (VA) are classified as either vascular tumors or vascular malformations. Vascular tumors are characterized by the neoplastic proliferation of endothelial cells, whereas vascular malformations result from defects in the pathways that regulate the development of vascular channels during embryogenesis. Dermatological ultrasound has emerged as a critical diagnostic tool for distinguishing VA from other conditions and differentiating among various types of VA by providing detailed imaging characteristics. In this study, we present cases of less common VA identified and characterized using dermatological ultrasound to illustrate the utility of this modality in clinical practice. Patients were randomly selected from clinical records (February 2021 to February 2024) with dermatological VA confirmed by histology, spanning ages 10 to 72 years. Inclusion required complete clinical records and ultrasound reports. The sample represents six different VA and illustrates a spectrum of complications observed in clinical practice. The selected cases include five vascular tumors: pyogenic granuloma, cutaneous angiosarcoma, extradigital glomus tumors, cherry angiomas, and angiokeratoma, and one vascular malformation: verrucous venous malformation. Despite their varied clinical presentations, dermatological ultrasound demonstrated distinct features for each type of anomaly, proving to be a valuable tool in the multidisciplinary management of cutaneous VA. This imaging modality enables precise evaluation and guides effective treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.