ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602024
Patient and Healthcare Professional Satisfaction, Acceptability, and Preference Experiences With Mirikizumab Administration for Ulcerative Colitis: An International Survey.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03519945 (A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis LUCENT 3), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Mirikizumab in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis LUCENT 3
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a need to better understand ulcerative colitis (UC) patient and healthcare provider (HCP) treatment satisfaction, acceptability, and preferences. Methods: Two international, cross-sectional, web-based surveys were conducted among participants of a phase 3 mirikizumab study (NCT03519945). The questions captured moderate-to-severe UC patients' experience, HCPs' perception of patients' experience, and HCPs' own experience with mirikizumab administration through intravenous (IV) infusions and subcutaneous (SC) injections. Results: Respondents included 93 patients and 42 HCPs from 11 countries. The majority of patients had UC >4 years (74.2%), were bionaive (68%), in remission at the time of the survey (63%). HCPs were primarily from the United States (57%), generally nurses (41%) or gastroenterologists (26%) with ≥6 years of experience in treating UC (57%). Most patients were "very satisfied/satisfied" (IV, 83%; SC, 91%), "completely/somewhat" accepting of mirikizumab administration (IV, 87%; SC, 97%), and agreed that improvement to their UC outweighed any administration dissatisfaction (90%). HCPs' perspectives of patients' experiences were higher: "very satisfied/satisfied" (IV, 93%; SC, 100%); "completely/somewhat" accepting (IV, 90%; SC, 98%). HCPs themselves were "very satisfied/satisfied" (IV, 81%; SC, 95%); gastroenterologists were "very satisfied" (IV, 82%; SC, 82%) more than nurses (IV, 29%; SC, 65%) who were generally at least "satisfied" (IV, 53%; SC, 35%). Two SC and monthly SC injections were "completely acceptable" by the patients (76% and 85%) and per HCPs' perceptions of patients' preferences (69% and 100%). Conclusions: Both patients and HCPs were satisfied with and accepted mirikizumab IV induction followed by monthly maintenance SC injections. UC improvement outweighed any administration dissatisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.