SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Detection of cardiac neuroendocrine tumour metastases by somatostatin receptor PET/CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful management and 10-year survival of a rectal neuroendocrine tumor with rare systemic metastases via a non-portal venous pathway.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Cardiac Metastases in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Single-Center Experience of Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac neuroendocrine tumour metastases (CNTM) are rare, but advancements in molecular imaging including somatostatin receptor PET/CT (SSTR-PET/CT) could lead to a more frequent identification. The aim of this article is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the detection of CNTM by SSTR-PET/CT. Methods: A comprehensive literature search of studies on CNTM detected by SSTR-PET/CT was carried out. Three different bibliographic databases were screened (Cochrane library, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE) until 20 August 2024. Two review authors independently selected the eligible original articles and performed the quality assessment and the data extraction. Main findings of eligible studies were summarized and a proportion meta-analysis on the prevalence of patients with CNTM among those with neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) performing SSTR-PET/CT was carried out using a random-effects model. Results: Ten articles reporting data on 163 patients with CNTM were included in the systematic review. SSTR was able to detect CNTM earlier compared to other radiological imaging techniques. Most patients with CNTM had other metastatic sites and CNTM were often asymptomatic. The meta-analysis of seven articles demonstrated a pooled prevalence of 1.5% (95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.9%) of patients with CNTM ( Conclusion: Evidence-based data demonstrate that SSTR-PET/CT enables early and better detection of CNTM compared to other radiological imaging methods. CNTM are encountered with a pooled prevalence of 1.5% of NEN patients performing SSTR-PET/CT. Prospective and multicentric studies are warranted to better clarify the impact of CNTM detection by SSTR-PET/CT on overall survival and clinical decision-making in NEN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.