Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39473469›Full record

ArticleEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.)2024

Chlorinated Polyfluoroalkyl Ether Sulfonic Acids (Cl-PFESAs) Are Associated with Eye Diseases in Humans and Eye Toxicity in Zebrafish.

Lu-Yin Wu, Li-Xia Liang, Yang Zhou, Zeeshan Mohammed, Zhengmin Min Qian, Stephen Edward McMillin, Maya Tabet, Chu Chu, Yuan-Yuan Fan, Jia-Xin Zhou and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment & health (Washington, D.C.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lu-Yin WuJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Li-Xia LiangJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yang ZhouState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Health Risk Assessment, South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Environmental Protection, Guangzhou 510655, China.
Zeeshan MohammedJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhengmin Min QianDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health & Social Justice, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Avenue, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, United States.
Stephen Edward McMillinSchool of Social Work, Saint Louis University, Tegeler Hall, 3550 Lindell Boulevard, St. Louis, Missouri 63103, United States.
Maya TabetCollege of Global Population Health, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy in St. Louis, 1 Pharmacy Place, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, United States.
Chu ChuGuangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Department of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yuan-Yuan FanJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jia-Xin ZhouJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jing-Wen HuangJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Wei-Hong TanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530021, China.
Guang-Hui DongJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2578-3369
Li-Zi LinJoint International Research Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Guangdong Provincial Engineering Technology Research Center of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence from animal experiments has shown that chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonic acids (Cl-PFESAs) can induce vision dysfunction in zebrafish. However, environmental epidemiological evidence supporting this hypothesis remains limited. In our case-control study, samples collected from 270 individuals (135 controls and 135 cases) from the Isomers of C8 Health Project data were analyzed for Cl-PFESAs. We also repeated our analysis on zebrafish to support our findings in humans and to decipher the mechanism underlying Cl-PFESA eye toxicity. The serum levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) and alternatives were significantly higher in the cases than in the controls. Higher serum Cl-PFESA levels were associated with greater odds of eye diseases, and the trend showed a statistically significant dose-dependent relationship. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) value indicated that 8:2 Cl-PFESA was the dominant eye disease risk factor among the 13 studied PFASs. In zebrafish experiments, Cl-PFESAs induced eye toxicity in adult zebrafish by oxidative damage and cell apoptosis. Compared to the control group, there was significantly reduced thicknesses of the inner plexiform layer (IPL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), and retinal tissue in the zebrafish exposed to Cl-PFESAs. Our study provides human clinical and animal experimental data, showing that exposure to PFASs increases the odds of the development of eye toxicity.

Identifiers

PMID39473469
PMCPMC11504596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.