ArticleJournal of biomedical materials research. Part A2025
In Vivo Assessment of an Antioxidant Hydrogel Vitreous Substitute.
Article in Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Novel Vitreous Substitutes in Animal and Human Models: A Systematic Review.BioMed research international · 2026Pooled it
- Replace the vitreous permanently.Nature reviews. Materials · 2026Article
- [Vitreous body substitutes: current solutions and future perspectives].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Replacing the vitreous body with hydrogels: Rationale and strategies.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The vitreous humor undergoes liquefaction with age, resulting in complications that may require a vitrectomy, or surgical removal of the vitreous from the eye. Silicone oil, a common vitreous substitute, lacks properties similar to the natural vitreous. In particular, it lacks antioxidants that may be necessary to reduce oxidative stress in the eye. The purpose of this study was to evaluate antioxidant-loaded hydrogel vitreous substitutes in a pilot in vivo study. Ascorbic acid and glutathione were loaded into synthesized PEGDA hydrogels. Following vitrectomy, experimental antioxidant hydrogels or silicone oil were injected into one eye of rabbits, while the other eye served as untreated or sham control. Ophthalmic assessments, including electroretinography, were performed. Levels of glutathione and ascorbic acid were higher in the eyes treated with the antioxidant-loaded hydrogel vitreous substitute, although this was not found to be significant after 28 days. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to clinical examination, and ocular health scores, electroretinograms, and histology were normal. These results indicate minimal concerns for the hydrogel formulation or high levels of antioxidants. Future research will assess the capability of vitreous substitutes to prolong antioxidant release, with the goal of minimizing cataract after vitrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.