Trial reportAnnals of medicine2024
Web application for assisting non-dermatology physicians in learning and managing patients with common cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Annals of medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs) remain a challenge for non-dermatologists. Medical-related applications to assist in learning about and managing patients with CADRs are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a web application for non-dermatologists in managing CADRs by comparing the knowledge scores of users and non-users. MATERIALS AND
methodsA multicenter randomized controlled trial was conducted between January 2023 and May 2023. Clinician participants were randomized (1:1) into the application and control groups using a simple randomization method. Knowledge scores between the groups were compared to evaluate the efficacy of the web application, and participants' perspectives on the application were also collected.
resultsA total of 44 clinician participants were included in the final analysis. The median age was 33.0 years (95% confidence interval (CI) 27.5-35.0) and predominantly female (56.8%). The score in the application group (median, 27.0; 95% CI, 25.0-28.0) was significantly higher than that in the control group (median, 14.0; 95% CI 13.0-17.0) (
conclusionThe web application for CADRs is an effective and convenient tool for assisting non-dermatologist physicians in learning and providing initial management with a high level of satisfaction. However, prospective long-term randomized controlled studies are required to confirm the efficacy of this tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.