ArticleBiophysical journal2024
Accurate drift-invariant single-molecule force calibration using the Hadamard variance.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protein force spectroscopy using magnetic tweezers: Slow and steady wins the race?Biophysical journal · 2026Review
- DNA twist at high alkali ion concentrations: evidence against C-form DNA in solution.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Materials and measurement in mechanobiology.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Single-molecule magnetic tweezers to unravel protein folding dynamics under force.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) techniques play a pivotal role in unraveling the mechanics and conformational transitions of biological macromolecules under external forces. Among these techniques, multiplexed magnetic tweezers (MT) are particularly well suited to probe very small forces, ≤1 pN, critical for studying noncovalent interactions and regulatory conformational changes at the single-molecule level. However, to apply and measure such small forces, a reliable and accurate force-calibration procedure is crucial. Here, we introduce a new approach to calibrate MT based on thermal motion using the Hadamard variance (HV). To test our method, we perform bead-tether Brownian dynamics simulations that mimic our experimental system and compare the performance of the HV method against two established techniques: power spectral density (PSD) and Allan variance (AV) analyses. Our analysis includes an assessment of each method's ability to mitigate common sources of additive noise, such as white and pink noise, as well as drift, which often complicate experimental data analysis. We find that the HV method exhibits overall similar or higher precision and accuracy, yielding lower force estimation errors across a wide range of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and drift speeds compared with the PSD and AV methods. Notably, the HV method remains robust against drift, maintaining consistent uncertainty levels across the entire studied SNR and drift speed spectrum. We also explore the HV method using experimental MT data, where we find overall smaller force estimation errors compared with PSD and AV approaches. Overall, the HV method offers a robust method for achieving sub-pN resolution and precision in multiplexed MT measurements. Its potential extends to other SMFS techniques, presenting exciting opportunities for advancing our understanding of mechanosensitivity and force generation in biological systems. To make our methods widely accessible to the research community, we provide a well-documented Python implementation of the HV method as an extension to the Tweezepy package.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.