ReviewChemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry2025
Radiation and DNA Origami Nanotechnology: Probing Structural Integrity at the Nanoscale.
Review in Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond apoptosis: nanomedicine enabled reprogramming of tumor cell death for next-generation radiosensitization.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Self-Assembled Rhodium Nanoantennas for Single-Protein UV SERS.Nanophotonics (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- In-Situ ssDNA Isolation from dsDNA Sources as a Streamlined Pathway to DNA Origami Assembly and Testing.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- CpG Methylation Protects DNA against Ionizing Radiation.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Radiation and DNA Origami Nanotechnology: Probing Structural Integrity at the Nanoscale.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
DNA nanotechnology has emerged as a groundbreaking field, using DNA as a scaffold to create nanostructures with customizable properties. These DNA nanostructures hold potential across various domains, from biomedicine to studying ionizing radiation-matter interactions at the nanoscale. This review explores how the various types of radiation, covering a spectrum from electrons and photons at sub-excitation energies to ion beams with high-linear energy transfer influence the structural integrity of DNA origami nanostructures. We discuss both direct effects and those mediated by secondary species like low-energy electrons (LEEs) and reactive oxygen species (ROS). Further we discuss the possibilities for applying radiation in modulating and controlling structural changes. Based on experimental insights, we identify current challenges in characterizing the responses of DNA nanostructures to radiation and outline further areas for investigation. This review not only clarifies the complex dynamics between ionizing radiation and DNA origami but also suggests new strategies for designing DNA nanostructures optimized for applications exposed to various qualities of ionizing radiation and their resulting byproducts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.