ReviewJournal of medical case reports2024
Reperfusion injury case following cervical fusion with OPLL: a case report and literature review.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- White cord syndrome: a rare and challenging diagnosis. Illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Updated review of cervical white cord syndrome (WCS)/reperfusion injury (RI); A "diagnosis of inclusion" requiring magnetic resonance (MR) confirmation, not just a "clinical diagnosis".Surgical neurology international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSpinal cord ischemic reperfusion injury is characterized by an abrupt decline in neurological function and only a few cases have been published in literature. Herein, we present a white cord syndrome following anterior decompression cervical fusion. CASE REPORT: A 54-year-old Jewish male patient was diagnosed with disc herniation among the intervertebral discs at C2, C3, C4, C6, and C7, along with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, pressuring more to the right side of the spinal canal, ruling-out cervical myelopathy. Under general anesthesia and multimodal intraoperative monitoring, he underwent laminectomy surgery from C3 to C6 and cervical fixation from C3 to C7. No blood pressure fluctuations occurred during surgery, and complete pressure release was achieved on the spinal cord and the nerve roots. In addition, neuromonitoring did not indicate any nerve damage during the surgery. A neurologic exam in the post-anesthesia care unit revealed weakness in his right hand and leg. A brain computed tomography scan ruled out cerebrovascular accident, neck computed tomography revealed optimal implant position, and magnetic resonance imaging ruled out spinal cord distress or injury. We treated him with intravenous fluids, steroids, painkillers, and anticoagulants. Following surgery, we involved the occupational therapy department. After a few days, we observed a significant improvement in motor function in the right leg; however, there was no change in the right hand.
conclusionWhite cord syndrome likely arises from reperfusion injury subsequent to surgical decompression of a compressed spinal cord segment. Although infrequent, it is imperative for spine surgeons to recognize this potential complication and apprise patients of it prior to the procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.