ArticlePlant methods2024
High-throughput phenotyping in maize and soybean genotypes using vegetation indices and computational intelligence.
Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing high-throughput phenotyping and artificial intelligence for soybean breeding: From trait assessment to data-driven decisions.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Breeding climate-resilient maize for food security in semi-arid sub-Saharan Africa: strategies and future directions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Advancing Crop Resilience Through High-Throughput Phenotyping for Crop Improvement in the Face of Climate Change.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Building models that allow phenotypic evaluation of complex agronomic traits in crops of global economic interest, such as grain yield (GY) in soybean and maize, is essential for improving the efficiency of breeding programs. In this sense, understanding the relationships between agronomic variables and those obtained by high-throughput phenotyping (HTP) is crucial to this goal. Our hypothesis is that vegetation indices (VIs) obtained from HTP can be used to indirectly measure agronomic variables in annual crops. The objectives were to study the association between agronomic variables in maize and soybean genotypes with VIs obtained from remote sensing and to identify computational intelligence for predicting GY of these crops from VIs as input in the models. Comparative trials were carried out with 30 maize genotypes in the 2020/2021, 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 crop seasons, and with 32 soybean genotypes in the 2021/2022 and 2022/2023 seasons. In all trials, an overflight was performed at R1 stage using the UAV Sensefly eBee equipped with a multispectral sensor for acquiring canopy reflectance in the green (550 nm), red (660 nm), near-infrared (735 nm) and infrared (790 nm) wavelengths, which were used to calculate the VIs assessed. Agronomic traits evaluated in maize crop were: leaf nitrogen content, plant height, first ear insertion height, and GY, while agronomic traits evaluated in soybean were: days to maturity, plant height, first pod insertion height, and GY. The association between the variables were expressed by a correlation network, and to identify which indices are best associated with each of the traits evaluated, a path analysis was performed. Lastly, VIs with a cause-and-effect association on each variable in maize and soybean trials were adopted as independent explanatory variables in multiple regression model (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN), in which the 10 best topologies able to simultaneously predict all the agronomic variables evaluated in each crop were selected. Our findings reveal that VIs can be used to predict agronomic variables in maize and soybean. Soil-adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) and Green Normalized Dif-ference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) have a positive and high direct effect on all agronomic variables evaluated in maize, while Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Red Edge Index (NDRE) have a positive cause-and-effect association with all soybean variables. ANN outperformed MLR, providing higher accuracy when predicting agronomic variables using the VIs select by path analysis as input. Future studies should evaluate other plant traits, such as physiological or nutritional ones, as well as different spectral variables from those evaluated here, with a view to contributing to an in-depth understanding about cause-and-effect relationships between plant traits and spectral variables. Such studies could contribute to more specific HTP at the level of traits of interest in each crop, helping to develop genetic materials that meet the future demands of population growth and climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.