Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39472970›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Predicting pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer using a machine learning approach.

Fangyuan Zhao, Eric Polley, Julian McClellan, Frederick Howard, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Dezheng Huo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pretreatment MRI radiomics for predicting pathological Miller-Payne grading in breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fangyuan ZhaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Eric PolleyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Julian McClellanDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frederick HowardDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Olufunmilayo I OlopadeDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology and Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dezheng HuoDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. dhuo@bsd.uchicago.edu.

Funding

UChicago Interdisciplinary Cancer Health Disparities SPOREP20CA233307 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F. · 2018 to 2020
$3.4M
Breast Cancer Research Foundation BCRF-23-071NCI NIH HHS P20 CA233307NCI NIH HHS P20CA233307Susan G. Komen TREND21675016U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH2210791
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor patients with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), most of the existing prediction models of pathologic complete response (pCR) using clinicopathological features were based on standard statistical models like logistic regression, while models based on machine learning mostly utilized imaging data and/or gene expression data. This study aims to develop a robust and accessible machine learning model to predict pCR using clinicopathological features alone, which can be used to facilitate clinical decision-making in diverse settings.

methodsThe model was developed and validated within the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB, 2018-2020) and an external cohort at the University of Chicago (2010-2020). We compared logistic regression and machine learning models, and examined whether incorporating quantitative clinicopathological features improved model performance. Decision curve analysis was conducted to assess the model's clinical utility.

resultsWe identified 56,209 NCDB patients receiving NACT (pCR rate: 34.0%). The machine learning model incorporating quantitative clinicopathological features showed the best discrimination performance among all the fitted models [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC): 0.785, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.778-0.792], along with outstanding calibration performance. The model performed best among patients with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer (AUC: 0.817, 95% CI: 0.802-0.832); and by adopting a 7% prediction threshold, the model achieved 90.5% sensitivity and 48.8% specificity, with decision curve analysis finding a 23.1% net reduction in chemotherapy use. In the external testing set of 584 patients (pCR rate: 33.4%), the model maintained robust performance both overall (AUC: 0.711, 95% CI: 0.668-0.753) and in the HR+/HER2- subgroup (AUC: 0.810, 95% CI: 0.742-0.878).

conclusionsThe study developed a machine learning model ( https://huolab.cri.uchicago.edu/sample-apps/pcrmodel ) to predict pCR in breast cancer patients undergoing NACT that demonstrated robust discrimination and calibration performance. The model performed particularly well among patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer, having the potential to identify patients who are less likely to achieve pCR and can consider alternative treatment strategies over chemotherapy. The model can also serve as a robust baseline model that can be integrated with smaller datasets containing additional granular features in future research.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMachine LearningNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClinical Decision-MakingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPathologic Complete ResponsePrognosisROC CurveTreatment OutcomeBreast cancerDecision curve analysisHormone receptor positiveMachine learningNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathologic complete responsePrediction model

Identifiers

PMID39472970
PMCPMC11520773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.