ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2024
An item bank to measure health-related quality of life among young children (0-5-years-old) affected by respiratory illnesses - expert stakeholders and end-users from the Western Cape, South Africa.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a crucial patient-centred outcome for developing policy. However, there is a lack of appropriate HRQoL measures for young children (0-5-years), who are particularly vulnerable to respiratory illnesses like pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and other respiratory infections, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to develop a disease-specific HRQoL item bank for young children with acute and chronic respiratory illnesses.
methodsAn exploratory sequential design with three phases was used to develop a HRQoL item bank. The content validity of the item bank was evaluated by local and international experts specialising in HRQoL and child health. The group included paediatric pulmonologists, researchers with expertise in respiratory illnesses, and experts in scale development. Cognitive interviews with 37 caregivers of children with TB, pneumonia, adenovirus respiratory infection, other lower respiratory tract infections, reactive airway disease, and protracted bronchitis in Cape Town, South Africa, and consultations with 22 stakeholders were conducted for final revisions. The item bank was progressively refined at each phase of the study.
findingsThe Delphi experts recommended dividing the item bank into two age groups (0-2-years and 3-5-years) and using a 5-point Likert scale. Overall, 41 items (42%) met the predetermined > 70% threshold for inclusion in the item bank. Cognitive interviews confirmed that the domains were relevant. Minor modifications were made to five items in cohort 1 (0-2-years) and seven in cohort 2 (3-5-years), with 8 items (13%) and 14 items (22%) excluded. Phase 3 consultations emphasised the importance of including all seven domains and expanding the items to cover early childhood development, play, social interactions, and care routines. The final item bank includes versions for both age groups and incorporates these refinements.
conclusionAn item bank was developed as a first step to develop a comprehensive disease-specific HRQoL tool for young children with respiratory illnesses in an LMIC. Input from caregivers and content experts was crucial in creating two HRQoL item banks tailored to the developmental differences between 0 and 2 and 3-5-year age groups. Their contributions ensured the tool effectively captures age-appropriate aspects of HRQoL. Future studies should focus on assessing the validity and reliability of these item banks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.