Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39472923›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Patient perspectives on health care models in cardiac surgery: a qualitative evaluation.

Mona Elisabeth Schmid, Jannik Stumm, Sina Stock, Evaldas Girdauskas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Moving forward, leaving the patients behind? A multilevel assessment framework for evaluating patient-centred, integrated care quality.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mona Elisabeth SchmidDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany. mona.schmid@uk-augsburg.de.
Jannik StummDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Sina Stock *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.
Evaldas Girdauskas *Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Augsburg, Stenglinstr. 2, 86156, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe implementation of ERAS represents a promising solution to improve treatment efficiency and facilitate patient involvement. This innovative care model aims to optimize recovery processes following surgeries by adopting a holistic, interprofessional approach. At our hospital, ERAS was implemented in minimally invasive heart valve surgery, offering two distinct ERAS models. Additionally, there is also the standard of care without ERAS. The objective of the study is to gain insight into patient satisfaction and perceived differences across these various care models.

methodsPatients were interviewed using semi-structured interviews approximately two to three months after undergoing surgery. The data were analysed using qualitative content analysis in accordance with the methodology proposed by Kuckartz. Four main categories were established: Preoperative care, postoperative care and communication, patient participation and involvement, and rehabilitation and post-clinical course.

resultsComprehensive preoperative education and seamless communication throughout the perioperative care journey were identified as fundamental to patient satisfaction and optimal care processes. Patients in the ERAS + model reported higher overall satisfaction with their care compared to patients in the standard of care and ERAS groups.

conclusionPreoperative education establishes the foundation for patients' subsequent behaviours and expectations regarding their treatment. Physical activity, nutrition, and mental health are significant aspects. The active involvement and participation of patients and their families in the treatment process facilitated superior postoperative care, intensive physiotherapy, mental support, and faster recovery. A functional flow of information throughout the entire care process is vital. Moreover, having a dedicated point of contact had a beneficial impact on patients´ well-being. The integration of innovative ERAS concepts, which encompass interprofessional preoperative patient education and psychosomatic support, represents a promising approach from a patient perspective, offering benefits to a broad spectrum of cardiac surgical patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionQualitative ResearchAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationCardiac surgeryERASHeart valve surgeryInterprofessional carePatient empowermentPatient evaluationPerioperative care

Identifiers

PMID39472923
PMCPMC11524004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.