SynthesisBMC women's health2024
Effectiveness of health education intervention on intention not to perform female genital mutilation/cutting in the future among key decision-makers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFemale Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) is a form of gender-based violence that has negative health consequences. The decision to perform FGM/C is often made collectively and a variety of actors influence the decision. There is inconsistent and inconclusive evidence that health education interventions lead behavioural changes related to FGM/C among key decision-makers. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the effectiveness of health education interventions on decision-makers intentions not to perform FGM/C in the future.
methodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the Preferred Item for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISRMA) guideline. Studies were obtained from databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane, African Journals Online and relevant lists of identified studies (interventional studies related to FGM/C among key decision-makers). Unpublished sources and organizational websites were also searched for relevant articles. The quality of studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project's. The meta-analysis was carried out using STATA.17 and Review Manager 5.3 software. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using the I
resultsThis meta-analysis included nineteen studies with a total of 13,326 study participants. The overall pooled relative risk of intention not to perform FGM/C in the future was 1.55 (95% CI;1.24, 1.94). In the subgroup analysis, the effect of health education on intention not to perform in the future was higher in studies that used both health education and other interventions (RR = 3.75, 95% CI; 2.04, 6.88) compared to those using only health education (RR = 1.35, 95% CI; 0.95, 1.92). Studies with longer intervention duration (above 12 months) had a greater effect on intention not to perform (RR = 1.34, 95% CI; 0.86, 2.09) compared to studies with a short intervention period (6-12 months) (RR = 1.14, 95% CI; 0.61, 2.15).
conclusionThis review examined the impact of health education on key decisions-makers' intention not to perform FGM/C in the future. Although the pooled effect size estimate may have been influenced by heterogeneity, the results suggest that education about FGM/C has a positive influence on the intentions of key decision-makers. It is recommended that health education interventions target local decision-makers such as religious and clan leaders and include them in initiatives aimed at preventing and eliminating FGM/C. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024542541.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.