ArticleRespiratory research2024
Automatic lung cancer subtyping using rapid on-site evaluation slides and serum biological markers.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in artificial intelligence across interventional pulmonology: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Label-free pathological subtyping of non-small cell lung cancer using deep classification and virtual immunohistochemical staining.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood tumor marker levels can indicate the location of lung cancer metastasis.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) plays an important role during transbronchial sampling, providing an intraoperative cytopathologic evaluation. However, the shortage of cytopathologists limits its wide application. This study aims to develop a deep learning model to automatically analyze ROSE cytological images.
methodsThe hierarchical multi-label lung cancer subtyping (HMLCS) model that combines whole slide images of ROSE slides and serum biological markers was proposed to discriminate between benign and malignant lesions and recognize different subtypes of lung cancer. A dataset of 811 ROSE slides and paired serum biological markers was retrospectively collected between July 2019 and November 2020, and randomly divided to train, validate, and test the HMLCS model. The area under the curve (AUC) and accuracy were calculated to assess the performance of the model, and Cohen's kappa (κ) was calculated to measure the agreement between the model and the annotation. The HMLCS model was also compared with professional staff.
resultsThe HMLCS model achieved AUC values of 0.9540 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9257-0.9823) in malignant/benign classification, 0.9126 (95% CI: 0.8756-0.9365) in malignancy subtyping (non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC], small cell lung cancer [SCLC], or other malignancies), and 0.9297 (95% CI: 0.9026-0.9603) in NSCLC subtyping (lung adenocarcinoma [LUAD], lung squamous cell carcinoma [LUSC], or NSCLC not otherwise specified [NSCLC-NOS]), respectively. In total, the model achieved an AUC of 0.8721 (95% CI: 0.7714-0.9258) and an accuracy of 0.7184 in the six-class classification task (benign, LUAD, LUSC, NSCLC-NOS, SCLC, or other malignancies). In addition, the model demonstrated a κ value of 0.6183 with the annotation, which was comparable to cytopathologists and superior to trained bronchoscopists and technicians.
conclusionThe HMLCS model showed promising performance in the multiclassification of lung lesions or intrathoracic lymphadenopathy, with potential application to provide real-time feedback regarding preliminary diagnoses of specimens during transbronchial sampling procedures. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.