Trial reportBMC oral health2024
A clinical trial of ropivacaine in arthocentesis for TMD.
Trial report in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Neurological Complications Following Temporomandibular Joint Injections in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Reported Adverse Events.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aims to compare the efficacy of ropivacaine and lidocaine in the treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders, with the goal of exploring a more effective treatment for TMJ disorders.
methodsPatients with Wilkes stage III and IV unilateral TMJ disorders were enrolled in the study. 0.5% ropivacaine was used for local anesthesia in group A, 2% lidocaine was used in group B. Sodium hyaluronate was injected after supra-articular lavage in both groups. The patients' general conditions, pain scores, and maximum opening before and after treatment were collected, the time of onset and maintenance of anesthesia, and the levels of inflammatory factors IL-1β and IL-6 in the joint lavage fluid were detected.
resultsStudy showed that the onset of anesthesia was faster and longer maintained in group A. The decrease in IL-1β was more pronounced in group A (16.08 ± 3.10) than in group B (18.03 ± 2.84), p < 0.05. At 2 months after treatment, the joint clicking rate was higher in group A (75%) compared to group B (35%), p < 0.05. At 3 months after treatment, the joint clicking rate was higher in group A (76.69%) compared to group B (40%) and the maximum mouth opening was greater in group A (45.00 ± 2.38) compared to group B (41.73 ± 4.18), p < 0.05. There were no statistically significant differences in VAS score and lateral excursion in group A compared with group B at 2 months and 3 months after treatment.
conclusionsCompared with lidocaine, the application of ropivacaine combined with sodium hyaluronate supra-articular lavage for the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder is more clinically effective. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300075241 (30/08/2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.