ArticleBMC public health2024
Anaemia among lactating adolescents (15-19 years) in India: a repeated cross-sectional analysis of the NFHS data (2005-2021).
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge and practices on anaemia among women of reproductive age in India.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnaemia continues to be a pressing public health concern in India. Despite the high burden of anaemia among lactating adolescents in the country, research addressing this concern among this population remains scarce. Hence, this study attempted to examine the prevalence and determinants of anaemia among lactating adolescents in India.
methodsWe used data from three latest rounds of the National Family Health Survey (NFHS) carried out in 2005-06, 2015-16, and 2019-21 and analysed a pooled sample of 10,689 lactating adolescents aged 15-19 years from these three rounds. Bivariate statistics was used to analyse the prevalence of anaemia according to the background characteristics of lactating adolescents. Further, binary multivariate logistic regression was carried out to examine the factors associated with anaemia in the study population.
resultsThree in every five lactating adolescents from the pooled sample were found to have anaemia (66.98% in NFHS-3, 61.08% in NFHS-4 and 66.27% in NFHS-5). Lactating adolescents with a higher education had a 30% lower likelihood [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 0.70, 95% CI: 0.49-1.01, p = 0.050] of being anaemic compared to those with no education. The likelihood of being anaemic among the poorest quintile was 41% (AOR: 1.41, 1.12-1.77; p = 0.003) higher than those from the richest quintile. Lactating adolescents from the Scheduled Tribe category had higher odds (AOR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.01-1.46, p = 0.001) of anaemia than those categorised as 'Others'. Those living in rural areas were 22% more likely to suffer from anaemia (AOR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.00-1.26, p = 0.050) compared to their urban counterparts. Additionally, underweight lactating adolescents were 15% more likely (AOR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05-1.26, p = 0.002) to be anaemic than those with normal BMI. Odds of being anaemic were higher among the ones receiving supplementary nutrition during pregnancy (AOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.08-1.29, p < 0.001) in contrast to those not receiving.
conclusionThe consistently high prevalence of anemia among lactating adolescents, especially among those with lower education level, rural residence, underweight status, and belonging to ST category and poorest quintile, underscore the urgent need for targeted public health interventions to address and reduce anemia in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.