ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Validation of CASPRI, GO-FAR, PIHCA scores in predicting favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest; A five-year three center retrospective study in IRAN.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery Phase in the Chain of Survival in Cardiac Arrest Patients: Scoping Review.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2026Review
- Barriers to the success of cardiopulmonary resuscitation teams in emergency departments: A perspective from nurses.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting neurological outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest is crucial for guiding subsequent clinical treatments. This study seeks to validate the effectiveness of the CASPRI, GO-FAR, and PIHCA tools in predicting favorable neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest.
methodThis retrospective study utilized a Utstein-style structured form to review the medical records of patients who experienced in-hospital cardiac arrest between March 2018 and March 2023. Predictors were examined using multivariable logistic regression, and the validity of the tools was assessed using ROC curves. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25 software.
resultsOut of the 1100 patients included in the study, 42 individuals (3.8%) achieved a favorable neurological outcome. multivariable regression analysis revealed that age, respiratory failure, resuscitation shift, duration of renal failure, and CPC score 24 h before cardiac arrest were significantly associated with favorable neurological outcomes. The predictive abilities of the CASPRI, GO-FAR, and PIHCA scores were calculated as 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-0.99), and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) respectively. A statistically significant difference was observed in the predictive abilities of the CASPRI and PIHCA scores (P = 0.001), while the difference between CASPRI and GO-FAR did not reach significance (P = 0.057). Additionally, there was no significant difference between the predictive abilities of GO-FAR and PIHCA scores (P = 0.159).
conclusionThe study concludes that CASPRI and GO-FAR scores show strong potential as objective measures for predicting favorable neurological outcomes post-cardiac arrest. Integrating these scores into clinical decision-making may enhance treatment and care strategies, in the Iranian healthcare context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.