ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Whole-genome sequencing-based analysis of Brucella species isolated from ruminants in various regions of Türki̇ye.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A family cluster of brucellosis in an underserved urban community in Guayaquil city, Ecuador.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Hybrid Whole Genomes ofMicroorganisms · 2025Article
- Genomic insights intoMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- The continuous expansion and spread of human brucellosis in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region: evidence from epidemiological and strains' genotyping-based analysis.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
- Genetic diversity atlas of Brucella melitensis strains from Sichuan Province, China.BMC microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBrucellosis, a zoonotic disease in Türkiye, which has significant direct and indirect impacts on the healthcare system and livestock. This study, which aimed to investigate the differences among Brucella spp. isolates originating from different regions of Türkiye, for implications for public health and veterinary medicine.
methodTwenty-one isolates from ruminants and two isolates from humans obtained from various regions of Türkiye were utilized in the study. The isolates were identified and biotyped using traditional microbiological procedures, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed. This was followed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)--based phylogenetic analysis and WGS-based analysis of virulence and resistance genes. Additionally, phenotypic antimicrobial resistance and phage susceptibilities were determined. The obtained data were then compared for concordance, ensuring the validity and reliability of the results.
resultsOur study, employing culture methods, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and WGS analyses, identified 11 Brucella melitensis (bv 3 (n = 9), one each bv 1 and bv 2) and 12 B. abortus (bv 3 (n = 11), bv 9 (n = 1)) isolates All B. abortus isolates were of bovine origin, while the B. melitensis isolates were from sheep (n = 7), goat (n = 1), ram (n = 1), and humans (n = 2). In the whole-genome SNP-based phylogenetic tree, all B. melitensis strains were found to be of the IIb subtype of genotype II associated with the Eastern Mediterranean lineage. Ten different genotypes were identified in the SNP analysis of the isolates, with a maximum SNP difference of 278 and a minimum SNP difference of 4 among these genotypes. According to the WGS-SNP-based phylogenetic tree of B. abortus isolates, they were grouped in clade C1. In the SNP analysis, where ten different genotypes were identified, the SNP difference among these genotypes was a maximum of 316 and a minimum of 6. In the in silico MLST analysis performed with WGS data, B. melitensis isolates were identified as ST8 and ST102 genotypes, while B. abortus isolates were identified as ST2 and ST3 genotypes. The dominant genotypes were ST8 for B. melitensis and ST2 for B. abortus, respectively. Virulence gene analysis conducted based on WGS data of the 23 B. abortus and B. melitensis isolates revealed 43 virulence gene-associated regions in all strains, irrespective of species, host, or isolation year. Although classical resistance-related genes were not detected by WGS-based antimicrobial resistance gene analysis, phenotypic resistance analysis revealed resistance to azithromycin, rifampin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in B. abortus and B. melitensis isolates.
conclusionBoth B. melitensis and B. abortus were circulating species in animals and human. The dominant genotypes were ST8 for B. melitensis and ST2 for B. abortus, respectively. All B. melitensis strains were found to be of the IIb subtype of genotype II associated with the Eastern Mediterranean lineage, while B. abortus isolates, they were grouped in clade C1. Further, a comprehensive study with a sufficient number of isolates covering all regions of Türkiye would provide more accurate information about the current epidemiological situation in the country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.