Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39472730›Full record

ArticleNature food2024

Whole-chain intensification of pig and chicken farming could lower emissions with economic and food production benefits.

Luxi Cheng, Xiuming Zhang, Chen Wang, Ouping Deng, Baojing Gu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luxi ChengCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiuming ZhangCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1961-3339
Chen WangCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Ouping DengCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Baojing GuCollege of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China. bjgu@zju.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3986-3519

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42261144001National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 42325707
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensified monogastric livestock management could conserve feed inputs and mitigate some of the environmental and climate challenges associated with animal production. In this study, we used data from 166 countries to model the environmental, climate and economic impacts of pig and chicken intensification. We found that whole-chain intensification could reduce annual nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions by 49% (4.6 Tg) and 68% (554 Tg CO

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryChickensAgricultureAnimal FeedAnimalsClimate ChangeFertilizersFood SupplyGreenhouse GasesNitrogenSwineFertilizersGreenhouse GasesNitrogen

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.