ArticleScientific reports2024
Integrating genomic and molecular data to predict antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration in Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbial biobanking: safeguarding the tiny treasures for sustainable human welfare.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
- Prediction of antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentration from bacterial genomes using a scalable and interpretable machine learning approach.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026Article
- stackPredAMR-a stacked random forest approach improves AMR phenotype prediction for multiple species and antimicrobial agents.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Antimicrobial Resistance Detection and Prediction inInfection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- The role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in predicting and combating antimicrobial resistance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) denotes the in vitro benchmark indicating the quantity of antibiotic required to inhibit proliferation of specific bacterial strains. Determining MIC values corresponding to the infecting bacterial strain is paramount for tailoring appropriate antibiotic therapy. In the interim between specimen collection and laboratory-derived MIC outcomes, clinicians frequently resort to empirical therapy informed by retrospective analyses. Here introduces two deep learning approaches, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based model and an Enformer-based model, integrating genomic data of Klebsiella Pneumoniae and molecular structural data of 20 antibiotics to anticipate the MIC value of the bacterium for each antibiotic under consideration. These models demonstrate enhanced raw accuracy over the existing state-of-the-art model, which rely exclusively on genomic data. The CNN-based model achieves a notable 20% increase in raw accuracy while further mirroring the 1-tier accuracy of the state-of-the-art model. Although the Enformer-based model does not quite reach the performance levels of the CNN-based model, it offers an advantage by eliminating the need for arbitrary data processing steps. This streamlining of the data processing pipeline facilitates fast updates and improves the model interpretability. It is expected that these deep learning paradigms can significantly inform and bolster clinician decision-making during the empirical treatment phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.