ArticleNPJ precision oncology2024
Exploiting common patterns in diverse cancer types via multi-task learning.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer: applications and advancements.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Current AI technologies in cancer diagnostics and treatment.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer prognosis requires precision to identify high-risk patients and improve survival outcomes. Conventional methods struggle with the complexity of genetic biomarkers and diverse medical data. Our study uses deep learning to distil high-dimensional medical data into low-dimensional feature vectors exploring shared patterns across cancer types. We developed a multi-task bimodal neural network integrating RNA Sequencing and clinical data from three The Cancer Genome Atlas project datasets: Breast Invasive Carcinoma, Lung Adenocarcinoma, and Colon Adenocarcinoma. Our approach significantly improved prognosis prediction, especially for Colon Adenocarcinoma, with up to 26% increase in concordance index and 41% in the area under the precision-recall curve. External validation with Small Cell Lung Cancer achieved comparable metrics, indicating that supplementing small datasets with data from other cancers can improve performance. This work represents initial strides in using multi-task learning for prognosis prediction across cancer types, potentially revealing shared mechanisms among cancers and contributing to future applications in precision medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.