ArticleScientific reports2024
Biochemical and morpho-physiological insights revealed low moisture stress adaptation mechanisms in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycinebetaine Improves Photosynthetic Performance and Antioxidant Defense in Barley Under Water Deficit Conditions.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Integrating multivariate selection indices with weighted rank aggregation to identify drought-tolerant Populus simonii × P. nigra FBMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is a multipurpose crop. Abiotic stresses, especially extreme heat and drought, limit crop growth and thus reduce cotton yield by about 50%. In this study, 30 cotton genotypes were tested against low moisture stress in a pot experiment in triplicates along with control under wire house conditions. At the 3-4 leaf stage, different morpho-physiological and biochemical parameters were measured in order to select the low moisture stress-tolerant genotypes. For the selection of the best performing genotypes, Multi-Trait Genotype-Ideotype Distance Index (MGIDI) was used for the ranking of genotypes on the basis of multiple indices. For biochemical traits, 09 (TPC, TF, TSP, MDA, SOD, POD, CAT, APX, and Proline) out of 24 showed significant genotypic effects and were used for MGIDI. Eight genotypes (N-812 N-1296 N-696 N-377 N-121-896 N-T86, and N-3496) were observed to be best performing than others at 25% selection pressure (SI = 25%). For morpho-physiological traits, 14 out of 15 showed significant genotypic effects and used for MGIDI. Ten genotypes (N-1237 N-812 N-1296 N-696 N-9078 N-377 N-512 N-121 N-375, and N-896) were observed to be best performing at 35% selection pressure (SI = 35%). Six genotypes, i.e. N-812-1296 N-696 N-377 N-121, and N-896 were found common in both MGIDI analysis. In conclusion, three genotypes, i.e. N-696, N-896, and N-T86 proved to be most resilient to low moisture stress. Develop protocols, identified genotypes and markers that can be used for development of climate-smart cotton genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.