ArticleScientific reports2024
Understanding the effects of weather parameters on the population dynamics of an endangered geophyte supports monitoring efficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Projected Climate Vulnerability ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to their complex life cycles geophytes are often neglected in conservation programs, despite they are important elements of early spring communities. Their life cycle is strongly affected by weather parameters, i.e. temperature, precipitation, and light, but the effects of these parameters are often contradictory and show high intra-annual variability even within species. Deeper knowledge about the abiotic factors affecting the population dynamics of geophytes is needed to support the designation of effective conservation plans. We aimed to explore the link between weather parameters and population dynamics of Colchicum bulbocodium, an endangered and strictly protected geophyte. We monitored three life cycle stages (flowering, growing, fruiting) of 1069 individuals in permanent plots for six consecutive years. Our results showed that life cycle of C. bulbocodium was strongly related to the actual weather parameters; the lagged effect of the previous year was weaker. Increasing temperature and lack of cold periods had negative effect on all life stages. We highlighted that population estimation based on the number of flowering individuals in a single year can underestimate population size by 40-83%. Monitoring in years following wet and cold springs and cold winters could increase the accuracy of population estimations of the flowering individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.