ArticleScientific reports2024
Reverse engineering of feedforward cortical-Hippocampal microcircuits for modelling neural network function and dysfunction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Alzheimer's disease with brain organoids: mechanisms, applications, and future directions.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Evolving alterations of structural organization and functional connectivity in feedforward neural networks after induced P301L tau mutation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineered biological neural networks are indispensable models for investigation of neural function and dysfunction from the subcellular to the network level. Notably, advanced neuroengineering approaches are of significant interest for their potential to replicate the topological and functional organization of brain networks. In this study, we reverse engineered feedforward neural networks of primary cortical and hippocampal neurons, using a custom-designed multinodal microfluidic device with Tesla valve inspired microtunnels. By interfacing this device with nanoporous microelectrodes, we show that the reverse engineered multinodal neural networks exhibit capacity for both segregated and integrated functional activity, mimicking brain network dynamics. To advocate the broader applicability of our model system, we induced localized perturbations with amyloid beta to study the impact of pathology on network functionality. Additionally, we demonstrate long-term culturing of subregion- and layer specific neurons extracted from the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus of adult Alzheimer's-model mice and rats. Our results thus highlight the potential of our approach for reverse engineering of anatomically relevant multinodal neural networks to study dynamic structure-function relationships in both healthy and pathological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.