ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhanced artificial hummingbird algorithm with chaotic traversal flight.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Characterization of Emergent Behavior in Bio-Inspired Swarm Intelligence Algorithms.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Multi-Band Temperature Measurement Data Retrieval Method Based on the Chaotic Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm (CAHA).Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sturnus vulgaris escape algorithm and its application to mechanical design.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tackling the shortcomings of slow convergence, imprecision, and entrapment in local optima inherent in traditional meta-heuristic algorithms, this study presents the enhanced artificial hummingbird algorithm with chaotic traversal flight (CEAHA), which employs chaotic ergodicity within the foundational framework of the conventional artificial hummingbird algorithm. This approach implements chaotic motion within local regions of the solution space, ensuring a thorough exploration of potential optima and preventing algorithmic stagnation at local maxima by guaranteeing a non-repetitive traversal of all search states. This study also analyzes the intrinsic mechanisms by which eight different chaotic mappings affect optimization performance, from the perspectives of invariant measures and traversal efficiency of ergodic chaotic motion. In comparative tests with 21 meta-heuristic algorithms on the CEC2014, CEC2019, and CEC2022 benchmark suites across various dimensions, CEAHA demonstrates superior optimization performance. Furthermore, the practicability and robustness of CEAHA have been confirmed in mechanical design optimization problems through 4 engineering instances: pressure vessel, gear trains, speed reducers, and piston levers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.