Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39472406›Full record

ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2024

Preregistered test of whether a virtual nose reduces cybersickness.

Sai Ho Yip, Adrian K T Ng, Henry Y K Lau, Jeffrey A Saunders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sai Ho YipUniversity of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Adrian K T NgUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Henry Y K LauUnited Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority, Abingdon, UK.
Jeffrey A SaundersUniversity of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong. jsaun@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-4694-7526

Funding

Hong Kong Research Grants Council GRF 17616419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that adding a visual depiction of a nose to virtual reality displays (virtual nose) can reduce motion sickness. If so, this would be a simple intervention that could improve the experience of a variety of VR applications. However, only one peer-reviewed study has reported a benefit from a virtual nose, and the effect was observed in a single low-powered experiment. To further test the effectiveness of a virtual nose for mitigating motion sickness in VR, we performed a preregistered experiment with higher power and better control. Subjects were presented with simulated movement in a virtual environment using a head-mounted display, and the resulting motion sickness was measured using the Fast Motion Sickness Scale (FMS) and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ). Conditions with and without a virtual nose were tested in separate sessions on different days, and the mean habituation effects were removed analytically. Awareness of the manipulation was assessed with a funnel debriefing procedure. The sample size (n = 32) was chosen to have over 90% power to detect the estimated effect size based on previous data (d

Indexed as

Motion SicknessVirtual RealityAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultCybersicknessFMSRest frame hypothesisSimulator sicknessSSQVirtual noseVirtual realityVisually-induced motion sickness

Identifiers

PMID39472406
PMCPMC11522211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.