Trial reportAnnals of hematology2025
The efficacy and safety of ZR2 versus R-CHOP-like for elderly patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a single-center prospective study in China.
Trial report in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Therapeutic outcomes of TP53-mutated diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.iScience · 2026Article
- Management of diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma in older adults: current strategies and emerging directions.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated preliminary efficacy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To compare the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib plus rituximab and lenalidomide (ZR2) and R-CHOP-like for elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, we conducted this single-center prospective study. Patients were treated with 6 cycles of ZR2 or R-CHOP-like regimen for the first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was complete response ratio (CRR). The secondary outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Between June 15, 2020, and March 11, 2023, 30 patients with ZR2 and 60 patients with R-CHOP-like were enrolled. There were no significant differences observed in CRR (P = 0.878), PFS (P = 0.555) and OS (P = 0.769) between ZR2 and R-CHOP-like group. While, patients in ZR2 group had the following features: significantly older (P = 0.002), more unfit (P < 0.001) and higher prognosis risk scores (P = 0.025). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 anemia (P = 0.008) and pneumonia (P = 0.001) was significantly lower in ZR2 group. Patients with germinal center B-cell-like subtype (GCB), large masses or TP53 mutations had a satisfactory remission rate in ZR2 group (57.1%, 77.8% and 60.0%, respectively). ZR2 and R-CHOP-like regimen had similar efficacy and survival. While, the safety profile for ZR2 was superior. GCB subtype, large masses and TP53 mutations may benefit from ZR2 regimen as well. Patients with EBV-positive and CARD11 mutations may need additional treatment rather than ZR2. Patients with gastrointestinal DLBCL have to be monitored closely by abdominal enhanced CT every cycle. Overall, ZR2 chemo-free regimen might be more appropriate for elderly DLBCL patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.