Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39472061›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Auditory Competition and Stimulus Selection across Spatial Locations from Midbrain to Forebrain in Barn Owls.

Andrea J Bae, Brian J Fischer, José L Peña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea J BaeDominick P Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461 andrea.bae@einsteinmed.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3284-7084
Brian J FischerDepartment of Mathematics, Seattle University, Seattle, Washington 98122.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5786-0544
José L PeñaDominick P Purpura Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461.

Funding

Coding of Auditory Space in the Avian BrainR01DC007690 · NIDCD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COL OF MED YESHIVA UNIV · PI PENA, JOSE L · 2005 to 2025
$7.5M
SUPPORT FOR THE ROSE F KENNEDY IDDRC P50P50HD105352 · NICHD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SOPHIE MOLHOLM, Steven Upshaw Walkley · 2021 to 2026
$7.0M
CRCNS:US-lsrael Research Proposal: To Elucidate Fundamental Mechanisms of Transformed Saliency Map toR01NS135851 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI FISCHER, BRIAN J, PENA, JOSE L · 2023 to 2025
$1.0M
Role of brain oscillations in midbrain and forebrain networks supporting stimulus selection in the sound localization pathway of barn owlsF30DC020109 · NIDCD · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI BAE, ANDREA J · 2021 to 2025
$212k
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD105352NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC020109NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007690NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS135851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barn owls enable investigation of neural mechanisms underlying stimulus selection of concurrent stimuli. The audiovisual space map in the optic tectum (OT), avian homolog of the superior colliculus, encodes relative strength of concurrent auditory stimuli through spike response rate and interneuronal spike train synchrony (STS). Open questions remain regarding stimulus selection in downstream forebrain regions lacking topographic coding of auditory space, including the functional consequences of interneuronal STS on interregional signaling. To this end, we presented concurrent stimuli at different locations and manipulated relative strength while simultaneously recording neural responses from OT and its downstream thalamic target, nucleus rotundus (nRt), in awake barn owls of both sexes. Results demonstrated that broadly spatially tuned nRt units exhibit different spike response patterns to competition depending on spatial tuning preferences. Modeling suggests nRt units integrate convergent inputs from distant locations across midbrain map regions. Additionally, STS within nRt reflects the temporal properties of the strongest stimulus. Furthermore, interregional STS between OT and nRt was strongest when spatial tuning overlap between units across regions was large and when the strongest stimulus location during competition was favorable for units in both regions. Additionally, though gamma oscillations synthesized within OT are weakly propagated within nRt, average gamma power across regions correlates with strength of interregional STS. Overall, we demonstrate that nRt integrates inputs across distant areas of OT, retains spatial information through differences in strength of inputs from various locations of the midbrain map across neurons, and prioritizes coding of identity features to the strongest sound.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory PathwaysStrigiformesAction PotentialsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionFemaleMaleMesencephalonProsencephalonSound LocalizationSuperior Colliculibarn owlbottom-up saliencegamma oscillationsinterregional signalingsound localizationstimulus selection

Identifiers

PMID39472061
PMCPMC11638815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.