Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471866›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Constructing stability: optimal learning in noisy ecological niches.

Edward D Lee, Jessica C Flack, David C Krakauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edward D LeeComplexity Science Hub, Josefstædter Strasse 39, Vienna 1080, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2075-6342
Jessica C FlackSanta Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6808-9695
David C KrakauerSanta Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Rd, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4860-2700

Funding

Austrian Science FundJames S. McDonnell FoundationOmega Miller FundRobert Wood Johnson Foundation 81366TWCF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organisms can learn in response to environmental inputs as well as actively modify their environments through niche construction on slower evolutionary time scales. How quickly should an organism respond to a changing environment, and when possible, should organisms adjust the time scale of environmental change? We formulate these questions using a model of learning costs that considers optimal time scales of both memory and environment. We derive a general, sublinear scaling law for optimal memory as a function of environmental persistence. This encapsulates a trade-off between remembering and forgetting. We place learning strategies within a niche construction dynamics in a game theoretic setting. Niche construction is found to reduce or stabilize environmental volatility when learned environmental resources can be monopolized. When learned resources are shared, niche destructors evolve to degrade the shared environment. We integrate these results into a metabolic scaling framework in order to derive learning strategies as a function of body size.

Indexed as

EcosystemLearningAnimalsBiological EvolutionBody SizeEnvironmentGame TheoryMemoryModels, Biologicaladaptationlearningniche constructionplasticityscalingstigmergy

Identifiers

PMID39471866
PMCPMC11606325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.