Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471857›Full record

SynthesisProceedings. Biological sciences2024

A systematic review of laboratory investigations into the pathogenesis of avian influenza viruses in wild avifauna of North America.

Matthew Gonnerman, Christina Leyson, Jeffery D Sullivan, Mary J Pantin-Jackwood, Erica Spackman, Jennifer M Mullinax, Diann J Prosser

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Landscape changes elevate the risk of avian influenza virus diversification and emergence in the East Asian-Australasian Flyway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew GonnermanDepartment of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0791-9218
Christina LeysonU.S. Department of Agriculture, Exotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jeffery D SullivanU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.
Mary J Pantin-JackwoodU.S. Department of Agriculture, Exotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Erica SpackmanU.S. Department of Agriculture, Exotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases unit, U.S. National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Jennifer M MullinaxDepartment of Environmental Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Diann J ProsserU.S. Geological Survey, Eastern Ecological Science Center, Laurel, MD 20708, USA.

Funding

U.S. Geological SurveyU.S. Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of consolidated information regarding the response of wild bird species to infection with avian influenza virus (AIV) is a challenge to both conservation managers and researchers alike, with related sectors also impacted, such as public health and commercial poultry. Using two independent searches, we reviewed published literature for studies describing wild bird species experimentally infected with avian influenza to assess host species' relative susceptibility to AIVs. Additionally, we summarize broad-scale parameters for elements such as shedding duration and minimum infectious dose that can be used in transmission modelling efforts. Our synthesis shows that waterfowl (i.e. Anatidae) compose the vast majority of published AIV pathobiology studies, whereas gulls and passerines are less represented in research despite evidence that they also are susceptible and contribute to highly pathogenic avian influenza disease dynamics. This study represents the first comprehensive effort to compile available literature regarding the pathobiology of AIVs in all wild birds in over a decade. This database can now serve as a tool to all researchers, providing generalized estimates of pathobiology parameters for a variety of wild avian families and an opportunity to critically examine and assess what is known and identify where further insight is needed.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBirdsInfluenza A virusInfluenza in BirdsAnimalsNorth Americaavian influenzachallenge studypathogenicitywild bird

Identifiers

PMID39471857
PMCPMC11521597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.