Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471841›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2024

Sex as a biological variable in ageing: insights and perspectives on the molecular and cellular hallmarks.

José Héctor Gibrán Fritz García, Claudia Isabelle Keller Valsecchi, M Felicia Basilicata

Abstract readReviewReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José Héctor Gibrán Fritz GarcíaInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.
Claudia Isabelle Keller ValsecchiInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4135-5927
M Felicia BasilicataInstitute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-9459

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)Forschungsinitiative Rheinland-PfalzHigh Potentials Grant program of University Medical Center MainzScience of Healthy Ageing Research Programme (SHARP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex-specific differences in lifespan and ageing are observed in various species. In humans, women generally live longer but are frailer and suffer from different age-related diseases compared to men. The hallmarks of ageing, such as genomic instability, telomere attrition or loss of proteostasis, exhibit sex-specific patterns. Sex chromosomes and sex hormones, as well as the epigenetic regulation of the inactive X chromosome, have been shown to affect lifespan and age-related diseases. Here we review the current knowledge on the biological basis of sex-biased ageing. While our review is focused on humans, we also discuss examples of model organisms such as the mouse, fruit fly or the killifish. Understanding these molecular differences is crucial as the elderly population is expected to double worldwide by 2050, making sex-specific approaches in the diagnosis, treatment, therapeutic development and prevention of age-related diseases a pressing need.

Indexed as

AgingSex CharacteristicsAnimalsCellular SenescenceEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleX ChromosomeX Chromosome InactivationGonadal Steroid Hormonesageinghallmarks of ageingsex chromosomessex hormonesX chromosomeX-chromosome inactivation

Identifiers

PMID39471841
PMCPMC11521605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.