Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471837›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2024

Molecular correlates of swarming behaviour in

Julien Devilliers, Hollie Marshall, Ben Warren, Charalambos P Kyriacou, Luciana O Araripe, Rafaela V Bruno, Ezio Rosato, Roberto Feuda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julien DevilliersNeurogenetics Group,University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0009-0000-1470-2108
Hollie MarshallNeurogenetics Group,University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-780X
Ben WarrenNeurogenetics Group,University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7871-0091
Charalambos P KyriacouNeurogenetics Group,University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4889-7606
Luciana O AraripeLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5878-1792
Rafaela V BrunoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-9768
Ezio RosatoNeurogenetics Group,University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7297-4697
Roberto FeudaNeurogenetics Group,University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0857-1732

Funding

Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroRoyal SocietyUKRI Global Challenges Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mosquitoes are the deadliest vectors of diseases. They impose a huge health burden on human populations spreading parasites as disparate as protozoans (malaria), viruses (yellow fever and more) and nematodes (filariasis) that cause life-threatening conditions. In recent years, mating has been proposed as a putative target for population control. Mosquitoes mate mid-air, in swarms initiated by males and triggered by a combination of internal and external stimuli. As the number of females in a swarm is limited, there is intense competition among males, and they 'retune' their physiology for this demanding behaviour. There is limited knowledge on the 'genetic reprogramming' required to enable swarming. Interestingly, recent evidence indicates that the upregulation of circadian clock genes may be involved in the swarming of malaria mosquitoes of the genus

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsCircadian ClocksFemaleMaleMosquito VectorsSexual Behavior, AnimalAedes aegypticircadian clockswarmingtranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID39471837
PMCPMC11521606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.