ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Comparison of Four Chimeric Antigens and Commercial Serological Assays for the Diagnosis of Trypanosoma cruzi Infection.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Absence of anti-One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- One Health Approach toTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- The Development of TIM-Barrel Based Multi-Epitope Protein forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chagas disease (CD), a neglected tropical disease caused by Trypanosoma cruzi, is a significant public health issue particularly in Latin America, affecting millions worldwide. Diagnosis is a challenge owing to the genetic diversity of T. cruzi and the complexities involved in selecting antigens for the detection of anti-T. cruzi antibodies. This study evaluated four chimeric recombinant antigens (IBMP-8.1, IBMP-8.2, IBMP-8.3, and IBMP-8.4) designed to enhance diagnostic accuracy by addressing assay variability. We compared the diagnostic performance of these chimeric antigens using indirect ELISA as a diagnostic platform, with three commercial serological assays in Brazil, analyzing 100 serum samples from individuals with confirmed CD and 86 from non-infected controls. The results revealed that all assays and antigens demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 100%, signifying their exceptional ability to distinguish between CD-positive and CD-negative samples. Notably, the chimeric antigens achieved 100% sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and kappa index, equaling or surpassing the commercial assays. This research highlights the efficacy of IBMP chimeric antigens as reliable diagnostic tools for CD, suggesting their potential integration into commercial diagnostic platforms to enhance the accuracy and reliability of CD detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.