Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471368›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Digital Phenotypes of Mobile Keyboard Backspace Rates and Their Associations With Symptoms of Mood Disorder: Algorithm Development and Validation.

Qimin Liu, Emma Ning, Mindy K Ross, Andrea Cladek, Sarah Kabir, Amruta Barve, Ellyn Kennelly, Faraz Hussain, Jennifer Duffecy, Scott A Langenecker and 6 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Unobtrusive inference of circadian rhythms from smartphone data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Qimin LiuDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3840-1136
Emma NingDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3579-8262
Mindy K RossDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8005-0053
Andrea CladekDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0639-0196
Sarah KabirDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5381-9656
Amruta BarveDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7692-9225
Ellyn KennellyDepartment of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-8656
Faraz HussainDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4910-1342
Jennifer DuffecyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4505-6820
Scott A LangeneckerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Ohio State University, College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7932-5494
Theresa M NguyenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3730-6807
Theja TulabandhulaDepartment of Information and Decision Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9111-7519
John ZuluetaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6834-1256
Alexander P DemosDepartment of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7964-7808
Alex LeowDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5660-8651
Olusola AjiloreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0737-0437

Funding

Unobtrusive Monitoring of Affective Symptoms and Cognition using Keyboard DynamicsR01MH120168 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI AJILORE, OLUSOLA A., LEOW, ALEX · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH120168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPassive sensing through smartphone keyboard data can be used to identify and monitor symptoms of mood disorders with low participant burden. Behavioral phenotyping based on mobile keystroke data can aid in clinical decision-making and provide insights into the individual symptoms of mood disorders.

objectiveThis study aims to derive digital phenotypes based on smartphone keyboard backspace use among 128 community adults across 2948 observations using a Bayesian mixture model.

methodsEligible study participants completed a virtual screening visit where all eligible participants were instructed to download the custom-built BiAffect smartphone keyboard (University of Illinois). The BiAffect keyboard unobtrusively captures keystroke dynamics. All eligible and consenting participants were instructed to use this keyboard exclusively for up to 4 weeks of the study in real life, and participants' compliance was checked at the 2 follow-up visits at week 2 and week 4. As part of the research protocol, every study participant underwent evaluations by a study psychiatrist during each visit.

resultsWe found that derived phenotypes were associated with not only the diagnoses and severity of depression and mania but also specific individual symptoms. Using a linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts accounting for the nested data structure from daily data, the backspace rates on the continuous scale did not differ between participants in the healthy control and in the mood disorders groups (P=.11). The 3-class model had mean backspace rates of 0.112, 0.180, and 0.268, respectively, with a SD of 0.048. In total, 3 classes, respectively, were estimated to comprise 37.5% (n=47), 54.4% (n=72), and 8.1% (n=9) of the sample. We grouped individuals into Low, Medium, and High backspace rate groups. Individuals with unipolar mood disorder were predominantly in the Medium group (n=54), with some in the Low group (n=27) and a few in the High group (n=6). The Medium group, compared with the Low group, had significantly higher ratings of depression (b=2.32, P=.008). The High group was not associated with ratings of depression with (P=.88) or without (P=.27) adjustment for medication and diagnoses. The High group, compared with the Low group, was associated with both nonzero ratings (b=1.91, P=.02) and higher ratings of mania (b=1.46, P<.001). The High group, compared with the Low group, showed significantly higher odds of elevated mood (P=.03), motor activity (P=.04), and irritability (P<.05).

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the promise of mobile typing kinematics in mood disorder research and practice. Monitoring a single mobile typing kinematic feature, that is, backspace rates, through passive sensing imposes a low burden on the participants. Based on real-life keystroke data, our derived digital phenotypes from this single feature can be useful for researchers and practitioners to distinguish between individuals with and those without mood disorder symptoms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremMood DisordersPhenotypeSmartphoneAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedclinical decision-makingdepressiondigital phenotypingkeyboard datakeyboard typingmania, mobile phonemixture modelmobile keyboardmonitoringmood disorderpassive sensingphenotypessmartphone

Identifiers

PMID39471368
PMCPMC11558221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.