ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2024
Patient-reported disability progression outcomes among patients with multiple sclerosis: Results of an outcomes-based agreement.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early Versus Delayed Treatment with Ocrelizumab: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutcomes-based agreements (OBAs) are agreements between payers and manufacturers in which payment for medications is tied to patient outcomes. These contracts aim to measure the value of prescription medications on predefined clinical indicators in real-world patient populations. OBAs are gaining traction in the United States as the health care industry shifts from volume-based to value-based care. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an appealing therapeutic area for OBAs because of its prevalence, high cost of medications, and multiple effective therapeutic options.
objectiveTo describe findings from an OBA that was prospectively conducted in a large regional health system for patients with MS taking interferon β-1a or dimethyl fumarate.
methodsIn this prospective real-world analysis, commercial or health insurance exchange members were included based on the parameters of the OBA. Disability progression was assessed using a patient-reported outcome, patient-determined disease steps (PDDS). In the OBA, members aged 18 years or older with an MS diagnosis were included in the contract. A baseline score was collected for eligible members, with follow-up scores occurring between a 90-day and 180-day postbaseline score. If a follow-up score was greater than the baseline score, a subsequent PDDS score was collected between 90-days and 120-days to determine if the PDDS score remained elevated, indicating that the member had disability progression.
resultsDuring the contract period, 410 patients were eligible for PDDS collection, with 241 and 169 patients in the dimethyl fumarate and interferon β-1a cohorts, respectively. There were 162 patients who were lost to follow-up, and 64 patients who were ineligible per contract parameters. Of the remaining 184 eligible patients (107 on dimethyl fumarate and 77 on interferon β-1a), 21 (11%) patients had confirmed disability progression (6 on dimethyl fumarate [5.6%] and 15 on interferon β-1a [19.5%]).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that meaningful patient-reported outcomes, such as disability progression, can be operationalized in an innovative OBA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.