ArticleBrazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery2024
Is It Safe to Use Arterial Grafts in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction? Short-Mid-Term Propensity Analysis.
Article in Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of multiple arterial grafts (MAGs) has an impact on patient survival; however, preference for its use in the acute phase of myocardial infarction (AMI) has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the short-mid-term clinical results of AMI patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with a single arterial graft (SAG) vs. MAGs.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional cohort study of 4,053 patients from the Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular II (REPLICCAR II). CABG in the AMI was considered when performed between one and seven days after diagnosis (n=238). Thirty-five patients underwent surgery with ≥ 2 arterial grafts (MAG group), population adjustment in SAG group was performed using the propensity score matching (PSM). Clinical follow-up was performed by telephone to assess need for readmission, new AMI, reoperation, and death.
resultsAfter PSM, 70 patients were evaluated. During hospitalization, a significant statistical difference was observed in the surgery duration: the MAG group had a median of 4.78 hours while the SAG group had 4.11 hours (P=0.040). Within the MAG group, there was a predominance use of bilateral internal thoracic artery (62.86%), followed by radial graft associated with the use of left internal thoracic artery (28.57%) and the combination of the three grafts (8.57%). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of outcomes up to 30 days after CABG or up to five years after CABG.
conclusionIn REPLICCAR II, usage of MAGs in the AMI was not associated with clinical worsening of patients until the mid-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.