Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471204›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

How can HIV self-testing facilitate increased access to HIV testing among multiply marginalised populations? Perspectives from GBMSM and trans women in England and Wales.

Isaac Yen-Hao Chu, Fiona M Burns, Talen Wright, Phil Samba, T Charles Witzel, Emily Jay Nicholls, Leanne McCabe, Andrew Phillips, Sheena McCormack, Alison J Rodger and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isaac Yen-Hao ChuInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0732-2032
Fiona M BurnsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Talen WrightBipolar UK, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4155-0821
Phil SambaThe Love Tank CIC, London, United Kingdom.
T Charles WitzelInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emily Jay NichollsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2061-8361
Leanne McCabeMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andrew PhillipsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sheena McCormackMedical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alison J RodgerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter WeatherburnFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4950-6163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV self-testing (HIVST) may facilitate marginalised populations' uptake of HIV testing, but whether the extent of marginalisation challenges individual uptake of HIVST remains under-researched. We aim to explore the perspectives of multiply marginalised cis-gender gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) and trans women on whether HIVST might increase their uptake of HIV testing.

methodsWe reanalysed qualitative interview data from SELPHI (the UK's largest HIVST randomised trial) collected between 2017 and 2020 from marginalised populations, defined as people self-identifying as non-heterosexual, transgender, non-White ethnicity and/or with low educational attainment. Thirty-eight interviews with multiply marginalised individuals were thematically examined using the framework method. We specifically focussed on kit usability (a function of the interaction between blood-based HIVST kits and users), perspectives on how HIVST can improve access to HIV testing and suggestions on need-based scale-up of HIVST.

resultsHIVST kits were considered usable and acceptable by multiply marginalised GBMSM and trans women. The majority of interviewees highlighted multi-levelled barriers to accessing HIV testing services due to structural and social marginalisation. Their multiply marginalised identities did not impede HIVST uptake but often form motivation to self-test. Three potential roles of HIVST in the HIV testing landscape were identified: (1) alternation of HIVST and facility-based testing, (2) integration of HIVST into sexual health services and (3) substituting facility-based testing with HIVST in the future. Perceived beneficiaries of HIVST included trans communities, individuals with undisclosed sexuality and people with physical disabilities. DISCUSSION: HIVST can facilitate marginalised populations' access and uptake of HIV testing by alternating with, integrating into and substituting for facility-based services in the UK. Marginalised identities did not present challenges but rather opportunities for person-centred scale-up of HIVST. Future implementation programmes should ensure equitable access to HIVST among trans people, men unable to disclose their sexuality, and perhaps people with physical disabilities.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsHIV TestingSelf-TestingTransgender PersonsAdultEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual and Gender MinoritiesWalesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39471204
PMCPMC11521265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.