Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471154›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

Inferring gender from first names: Comparing the accuracy of Genderize, Gender API, and the gender R package on authors of diverse nationality.

Alexander D VanHelene, Ishaani Khatri, C Beau Hilton, Sanjay Mishra, Ece D Gamsiz Uzun, Jeremy L Warner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Who Agrees to Review a Manuscript inEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  4. Progress and Gaps: Two Decades of Female Authorship in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Authorship and citation trends in dementia research: A path to equitable career development for scientists.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Informal connections outweigh coauthorship ties in academic impact.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Women climate scientists are connected, productive, and successful but have shorter careers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander D VanHeleneLifespan Cancer Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6197-949X
Ishaani KhatriWarren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
C Beau HiltonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1363-7452
Sanjay MishraLifespan Cancer Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7775-9600
Ece D Gamsiz UzunCenter for Clinical Cancer Informatics and Data Science, Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Jeremy L WarnerLifespan Cancer Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2851-7242

Funding

Cancer Deep Phenotyping from Electronic Medical RecordsU24CA248010 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HARRY S HOCHHEISER, GUERGANA K. SAVOVA · 2020 to 2026
$6.1M
Enhancing the HemOnc Knowledgebase of Chemotherapy Drugs and RegimensU24CA265879 · NCI · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI Jeremy L Warner · 2022 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA248010NCI NIH HHS U24 CA265879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meta-researchers commonly leverage tools that infer gender from first names, especially when studying gender disparities. However, tools vary in their accuracy, ease of use, and cost. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy and cost of the commercial software Genderize and Gender API, and the open-source gender R package. Differences in binary gender prediction accuracy between the three services were evaluated. Gender prediction accuracy was tested on a multi-national dataset of 32,968 gender-labeled clinical trial authors. Additionally, two datasets from previous studies with 5779 and 6131 names, respectively, were re-evaluated with modern implementations of Genderize and Gender API. The gender inference accuracy of Genderize and Gender API were compared, both with and without supplying trialists' country of origin in the API call. The accuracy of the gender R package was only evaluated without supplying countries of origin. The accuracy of Genderize, Gender API, and the gender R package were defined as the percentage of correct gender predictions. Accuracy differences between methods were evaluated using McNemar's test. Genderize and Gender API demonstrated 96.6% and 96.1% accuracy, respectively, when countries of origin were not supplied in the API calls. Genderize and Gender API achieved the highest accuracy when predicting the gender of German authors with accuracies greater than 98%. Genderize and Gender API were least accurate with South Korean, Chinese, Singaporean, and Taiwanese authors, demonstrating below 82% accuracy. Genderize can provide similar accuracy to Gender API while being 4.85x less expensive. The gender R package achieved below 86% accuracy on the full dataset. In the replication studies, Genderize and gender API demonstrated better performance than in the original publications. Our results indicate that Genderize and Gender API achieve similar accuracy on a multinational dataset. The gender R package is uniformly less accurate than Genderize and Gender API.

Identifiers

PMID39471154
PMCPMC11521266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.