ArticlePloS one2024
Sweet enhancers of polymerase chain reaction.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GC-rich regions affect amplification efficiency of neighboring amplicons in qPCR and digital PCR.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multiplexed Isothermal Amplification Assay for the Detection ofACS omega · 2026Article
- Improving STR typing for low template DNA by abasic-site-mediated semi-linear preamplification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although faster and powerful, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) often failed to amplify targets efficiently. Numerous PCR enhancers have been used to increase the amplification efficiency of difficult DNA targets. However, there is no systematic comparison of their effects in normal and difficult PCR conditions. In this paper, we have selected nine different PCR enhancers that can promote the PCR amplification efficiency. We have compared their effect in Taq DNA polymerase thermostability, inhibitor resistance, and amplification of various DNA targets. Although the PCR enhancers more or less reduced the amplification efficiency of DNA fragments with moderate GC-content, they were able to improve the amplification efficiency and specificity of GC-rich fragments. Betaine outperformed the other enhancers in amplification of GC-rich DNA fragments, thermostabilizing Taq DNA polymerase, and inhibitor tolerance. Sucrose and trehalose showed similar effect in thermostabilizing Taq DNA polymerase and inhibitor tolerance, while they showed mildest inhibitory effect on normal PCR. For GC-rich region-containing long DNA fragment amplification, 1 M betaine, 0.5 M betaine + 0.2 M sucrose, or 1 M betaine + 0.1 M sucrose can be used to effectively promote the amplification, while keep their negative effect in amplification of normal fragment to a minimal level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.