Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39471149›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Time course of visual attention in rats by atomic magnetometer.

Fan Liu, Zhao Xiang, Yuhai Chen, Guanzhong Lu, Jiahao Wang, Jia Yao, Ying Zhang, Xuejiao Ma, Qiang Lin, Yi Ruan

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fan LiuLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Zhao XiangLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Yuhai ChenLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Guanzhong LuLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Jiahao WangLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.
Jia YaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Ying ZhangShaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Xuejiao MaBeijing Smart-Chip Microelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing, China.
Qiang LinLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9111-609X
Yi RuanLaboratory of Quantum Precision Measurement of Zhejiang Province, Center for Optics and Optoelectronics Research, Collaborative Innovation Center for Information Technology in Biological and Medical Physics, College of Science, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-298X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atomic magnetometer (AM) is utilized to non-invasively detect event-related magnetic fields (ERMFs) evoked by visual stimuli in rats. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between N2-like amplitude and visual attention. To achieve this, we combined the AM with a visual stimulation system and employed the passive single-stimulus paradigm. By measuring the ERMFs at various inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) with a sensitivity of 20 fT/[Formula: see text], we analyzed the effects of the ISI and the 'habituation' resulting from repeated stimuli on the N2-like amplitude. Our method serves as a valuable reference for studying the passive single-stimulus paradigm and the time course of mammalian attention.

Indexed as

AttentionMagnetometryAnimalsMagnetic FieldsMalePhotic StimulationRatsRats, WistarTime FactorsVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID39471149
PMCPMC11521302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.