ArticlePloS one2024
Genetic and pathogenic potential of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N8 viruses from live bird markets in Egypt in avian and mammalian models.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic surveillance and evolution of co-circulating avian influenza H5N1 and H5N8 viruses in Egypt, 2022-2024.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Article
- Genomic signatures and host adaptation of H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b: A call for global surveillance and multi-target antiviral strategies.Current research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since its first isolation from migratory birds in Egypt in 2016, highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N8 has caused several outbreaks among domestic poultry in various areas of the country affecting poultry health and production systems. However, the genetic and biological properties of the H5N8 HPAI viruses have not been fully elucidated yet. In this study, we aimed to monitor the evolution of circulating H5N8 viruses and identify the pathogenicity and mammalian adaptation in vitro and in vivo. Three H5N8 HPAI viruses were used in this study and were isolated in 2021-2022 from poultry and wild birds during our routine surveillance. RNA extracts were subjected to full genome sequencing. Genetic, phylogenetic, and antigenic analyses were performed to assess viral characteristics and similarities to previously isolated viruses. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the hemagglutinin genes of the three isolates belonged to clade 2.3.4.4b and grouped with the 2019 viruses from G3 with high similarity to Russian and European lineages. Multiple basic amino acids were observed at cleavage sites in the hemagglutinin proteins of the H5N8 isolates, indicating high pathogenicity. In addition, several mutations associated with increased virulence and polymerase activity in mammals were observed. Growth kinetics assays showed that the H5N8 isolate is capable of replicating efficiently in mammalian cells lines. In vivo studies were conducted in SPF chickens (White Leghorn), mice, and hamsters to compare the virological characteristics of the 2022 H5N8 isolates with previous H5N8 viruses isolated in 2016 from the first introduction. The H5N8 viruses caused lethal infection in all tested chickens and transmitted by direct contact. However, we showed that the 2016 H5N8 virus causes a higher mortality in chickens compared to 2022 H5N8 virus. Moreover, the 2022 virus can replicate efficiently in hamsters and mice without preadaptation causing systemic infection. These findings underscore the need for continued surveillance of H5 viruses to identify circulating strains, determine the commercial vaccine's effectiveness, and identify zoonotic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.