ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2024
Comparison of the Safety of Aspirin Monotherapy and Aspirin and P2Y12 Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients Post Coil Embolization During Admission: A Cross-Sectional Study Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database.
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSome aspects regarding the use of antiplatelet agents after coil embolization for subarachnoid hemorrhage during admission remain unclear. This study used diagnostic procedure combination (DPC) data to investigate the safety and prognostic effects of aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy on bleeding events.
methodsThis cross-sectional study used Japanese DPC data to assess patients who were hospitalized with subarachnoid hemorrhage and received aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 4421). The aspirin monotherapy (A group, n = 2848) and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy (AP group, n = 1573) groups were compared. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence of bleeding events and proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤ 2 at discharge, respectively. Data was analyzed using multivariable adjusted logistic regression (significance level, 5%).
resultsThe adjusted odds ratio in AP group, with A group as the reference, for bleeding events and the proportion of patients with mRS score ≤ 2 at discharge were 0.97 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.75-1.26, p = 0.839) and 1.09 (95% CI: 0.92-1.29, p = 0.302), respectively.
conclusionsThere are no differences in the incidence of bleeding events or good clinical outcomes (mRS score ≤ 2 at discharge) between aspirin monotherapy and aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor combination therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.